
November 24, 2025 - PBS News Hour full episode
11/24/2025 | 57m 46sVideo has Closed Captions
November 24, 2025 - PBS News Hour full episode
Monday on the News hour, a judge throws out the DOJ cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Ukraine and European leaders work to revise a peace plan to end the war with Russia as the origins of the plan come under question. Plus, a look at immigration agents arresting migrants at their mandatory court check-ins.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
Major corporate funding for the PBS News Hour is provided by BDO, BNSF, Consumer Cellular, American Cruise Lines, and Raymond James. Funding for the PBS NewsHour Weekend is provided by...

November 24, 2025 - PBS News Hour full episode
11/24/2025 | 57m 46sVideo has Closed Captions
Monday on the News hour, a judge throws out the DOJ cases against former FBI Director James Comey and New York Attorney General Letitia James. Ukraine and European leaders work to revise a peace plan to end the war with Russia as the origins of the plan come under question. Plus, a look at immigration agents arresting migrants at their mandatory court check-ins.
Problems playing video? | Closed Captioning Feedback
How to Watch PBS News Hour
PBS News Hour is available to stream on pbs.org and the free PBS App, available on iPhone, Apple TV, Android TV, Android smartphones, Amazon Fire TV, Amazon Fire Tablet, Roku, Samsung Smart TV, and Vizio.
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorshipAMNA NAWAZ: Good evening.
I'm Amna Nawaz.
GEOFF BENNETT: And I'm Geoff Bennett.
On the "News Hour" tonight: A judge# throws out.. former FBI Director James Comey and New# York Attorney General Letitia James.
AMNA NAWAZ: Ukrainian and European# leaders work to revise a 28-point## peace plan to end the war with Russia, even as# the origins of the plan come under question.
GEOFF BENNETT: And an in-depth look# at an immigration enforcement tactic,## arresting migrants at their# mandatory court check-ins.
JOSH GOODMAN, Associated Press:# They didn't have a criminal record.## They were making an asylum claim# and going through all the stages## that are required and were completely# blindsided by what happened to them.
(BREAK) GEOFF BENNETT: Welcome to the "News Hour."
A federal judge has dismissed# the indictments against former## FBI Director James Comey and New York# State Attorney General Letitia James.
AMNA NAWAZ: In twin rulings today, Judge Cameron# McGowan Currie found the appointment of Lindsey## Halligan as interim U.S.
attorney was invalid# and unlawful.
Halligan had been handpicked by## President Donald Trump to bring criminal charges# against his political foes when a predecessor## refused.
She was then swiftly appointed as interim# U.S.
attorney by Attorney General Pam Bondi.
Comey reacted to the news today.
JAMES COMEY, Former FBI Director: I'm grateful# that the court ended the case against me,## which was a prosecution based on malevolence# and incompetence and a reflection of what## the Department of Justice has become under# Donald Trump, which is heartbreaking.
But I was also inspired by the example# of the career people who refused to## be part of this travesty.
It cost some# of them their jobs, which is painful,## but it preserved their integrity, which is# beyond price.
And I know they will serve again.
GEOFF BENNETT: And our White# House correspondent, Liz Landers,## asked Press Secretary Karoline Leavitt# about this today.
Here is her response.
KAROLINE LEAVITT, White House Press Secretary:# I know there was a judge who is clearly trying## to shield Letitia James and James Comey from# receiving accountability.
And that's why they## took this unprecedented action to throw away# the indictments against these two individuals.
But the Department of Justice will# be appealing very soon.
And it is## our position that Lindsey Halligan is# extremely qualified for this position,## but, more importantly, was# legally appointed to it.
AMNA NAWAZ: NPR's national justice correspondent,## Carrie Johnson, is covering# the latest and joins me now.
So, Carrie, let's start with Jim Comey's# case.
He was charged with lying to Congress,## obstructing a congressional proceeding.# The judge in his dismissal wrote today:## "All actions flowing from Ms.
Halligan's defective# appointment, including securing and signing Mr.## Comey's indictment, were unlawful exercises# of executive power and are hereby set aside."
So, Carrie, to be clear, this wasn't about the## charges themselves.
This was# about Halligan's appointment.
CARRIE JOHNSON, Justice Correspondent,# NPR: That's right.
This was about the## way in which the Trump administration# went about installing Li.. who has no prosecutorial# experience, into this job.
The Constitution and federal law gives presidents# a lot of power to pick U.S.
attorneys and gives## the Senate the power to advise the president# and eventually confirm.
But in cases where## that isn't possible, the president can# install temporary people for 120 days.
Those appointments expire after that time, and# there's a complex thicket of rules and laws## about how to proceed thereafter.
In essence,# Judge Currie in this decision said the Trump## administration did this the wrong way and, as a# result, the things that Lindsey Halligan did in## the job, things like indicting Jim Comey,# have to go away, at least temporarily.
AMNA NAWAZ: And what about when it comes to# the charges against Letitia James?
We know## Halligan also secured a federal grand jury# indictment on mortgage fraud charges there.
And Letitia James actually posted a response# today online, saying: "I remain fearless in the## face of these baseless charges as I continue# fighting for New Yorkers every single day."
What else should we understand about that case?
CARRIE JOHNSON: Yes, the Tish James case# was also thrown out by the judge today## using the same reasoning that Lindsey# Halligan's appointment was defective.
And that being said, there's a twist# with the James case that doesn't## apply to the Comey case, and that's that# the statute of limitations as to James## Comey in his testimony to Congress in 2020# was really about to expire right around the## time he was indicted.
So now there's an open# question as to whether Halligan will be able## to or the Justice Department will be# able to reindict him in a valid way.
With James, the statute of limitations has# not yet expired, so there is a path for the## Justice Department a little more easily# at least to try to renew charges against## her.
Her attorney said today they're going# to fight those charges if they come again.
AMNA NAWAZ: And, Carrie, just for# context to remind people here,## we know the Comey indictment came down# about five days after President Trump## had posted online that Comey, James and# California Democratic Senator Adam Schiff## were all -- quote -- "guilty as hell.
"# James was then indicted a few weeks later.
Remind us why President Trump has been# pushing so hard for these indictments.
CARRIE JOHNSON: Well, all three of# these people -- and Adam Schiff has## not yet been charged with any crime.# He denies any kind of wrongdoing.
But Comey and James had both pleaded not guilty# before their indictments were thrown out today.## And they were both targeted at least in part,# they say, because they had investigated Donald## Trump in the past, Comey as former FBI director# Trump blames for the Russia investigation.
And Tish James had proceeded with a civil fraud# suit against Donald Trump and his company,## winning a judgment against them.
The# monetary penalty has been thrown out,## but that case stands.
Trump is still appealing it.
AMNA NAWAZ: Thirty seconds or so left here,# Carrie.
What do we expect to happen next?
CARRIE JOHNSON: Yes, it's quite possible.
Lindsay Halligan has, according to the attorney# general,.. Justice Department, something called special# attorney.
And she may try to go ahead and get new## grand juries to bring new criminal charges against# Tish James and possibly Jim Comey moving forward.
Important to note, Amna, that both# of these people say they were the## victim of vindictive or selective# prosecution, and so they have other## bases to try to get those possible new# charges thrown out down the road too.
AMNA NAWAZ: All right, that's NPR's Carrie# Johnson joining us tonight with the very latest.
Carrie, thank you.
CARRIE JOHNSON: Thank you.
GEOFF BENNETT: Today, U.S.
and Ukrainian# officials worked to bridge gaps in a U.S.## document designed to end the near-four-year war.# Both sides say the U.S.
has agreed to edit what## was a 28-point proposal that sparked# bipartisan and international concern,## concern that the U.S.
was imposing demands sought# by Russia and impossible for Ukraine to accept.
Nick Schifrin has been reporting every development## through the weekend and is# back with us this evening.
So, Nick, how much progress has# been made today on this proposal?
NICK SCHIFRIN: European officials tell me, Geoff,## that the proposal is now down to# 19 points, instead of 28 points,## and there has been progress between the U.S.# and Ukraine, as you said, in narrowing the gaps.
The U.S.
says there are two major sticking points.# Remember, the original document required Ukraine## to cap the size of its military, give up its# NATO ambitions, and surrender territory in## the Donetsk that it still holds, despite# 10 years of Russia trying to capture it.
But in meetings today, as well as yesterday in# Geneva led by Secretary of State Marco Rubio and## the Ukrainian presidential chief of staff Andriy# Yermak, the U.S.
heard out the Ukrainian side.## And, today, Karoline Leavitt, the White House# spokesperson, said the U.S.
was optimistic.
KAROLINE LEAVITT, White House Press Secretary:# The vast majority of these points have been agreed## upon.
The Ukrainians have worked on language# with us together, and you heard that from their## delegation directly yesterday.
So we feel as# though we're in a very good place.
Of course,## we have to make sure that all of these# points are agreed too, and then, of course,## we're going to have to make sure the other party# in this war, the Russians, agree to them as well.
NICK SCHIFRIN: Levitt specifically said there were## two major points of disagreements.# We don't know what they are, Geoff.
But European officials tell me that the single# most difficult perhaps point of disagreement,## that is Ukraine giving up that territory,## it's been decided that only Trump and Zelenskyy# personally will have to decide that issue.
Here's Zelenskyy tonight.
VOLODYMYR ZELENSKYY, Ukrainian# President (through translator):## There are fewer points, no longer 28, and# many.. into account in this framework.
There is still# work for all of us to do together.
It is very## challenging to finalize the document,# and we must do everything with dignity.
We appreciate that most of# the world is ready to help us,## and that the American side is# approaching this constructively.
NICK SCHIFRIN: Constructively also means,## Geoff, that the Thanksgiving deadline that# President Trum.. Karoline Leavitt said today that the deadline# was just -- quote -- "as soon as possible."
And we also know that some of the other larger# issues that have to do with NATO and Ukraine,## language about whether Ukraine can ever join# NATO, language about how Europe will treat## frozen assets, those will be treated separately in# negotiations within the U.S.
and Western Europe.
GEOFF BENNETT: Well, Nick, it sounds like we're# in a very different place than late last week,## or even this past weekend, when you attended# the Halifax International Security Forum,## when members of the congressional delegation,# based on your reporting -- you were first to## report this -- they were changing the narrative# around this document fairly dramatically.
NICK SCHIFRIN: We certainly are in different# place.
Not only the text is very different,## as we have discussed, but this weekend at Halifax,## a congressional bipartisan group led by# New Hampshire Democrat Jeanne Shaheen,## as well as South Dakota Republican Mike Rounds,# Maine independent Angus King, announced that Rubio## had told them that this 28-point document# wasn't American, but was in fact Russian.
Take a listen first to Rounds and then King.
SEN.
MIKE ROUNDS (R-SD): What I can share with you# is what we have received today from the secretary,## and what he told us was that this was not the# American proposal.
This was a proposal which## was received by someone who has identified# and they believe to be representing Russia.
SEN.
ANGUS KING (I-ME): The leaked 28-point# plan, which, according to Secretary Rubio,## is not the administration's position, it is# essentially the wish list of the Russians.
NICK SCHIFRIN: Rubio's spokesperson went on# to call that -- quote -- "a blatant lie."
After that, both senators released statements not# disavowing what they said, but not repeating it## either.
Look, the bottom line is, Rubio insists# the 28-point plan was American.
And, frankly,## we're beyond that at this point, Geoff.# This new 19-point plan is very different.
And, of course, all of this is a negotiation with## Ukraine way before we get# to Moscow.
And, of course,## any document that's more acceptable to Ukraine# becomes more difficult for Moscow to accept.
GEOFF BENNETT: Nick Schifrin, terrific# reporting, as always.
We appreciate it.
NICK SCHIFRIN: Thank you.
GEOFF BENNETT: Turning to the day's other headlines: The#Pentagon says it's investigating Arizona## Senator Mark Kelly over a video in which# he and a number of other U.S.
lawmakers## urged U.S.
troops to refuse# to follow illegal orders.
Defense officials say Kelly's comments may# have interfered with the loyalty, morale,## or good order and discipline of the armed# forces.
Kelly retired at the rank of captain.## He would have to be recalled to active duty by the# defense secretary to face any disciplinary action.
In a statement, Kelly said: "I have given# too much to this country to be silenced## by bullies who care more about their own# power than protecting the Constitution."
The Trump administration formally designated# Venezuela's Cartel de los Soles as a foreign## terror organization today.
The move is part of a## sweeping new pressure campaign against# President Nicolas Maduro's government,## as President Trump openly weighs whether the U.S.# should take military action against Venezuela.
Secretary of State Marco Rubio has accused the# group of being responsible for terrorist violence.## But the Maduro government denies the cartel even# exists.
And regional experts say it's less a## single organization than a nickname.
They describe# it as an umbrella term for high-ranking Venezuelan## military and political figures accused of# profiting from the international narcotics trade.
Turning now to the Middle East, the Gaza# Humanitarian Foundation says it's permanently## ending its operations in the territory.
In# a statement, the U.S.- and Israeli-backed## group claims it was the only aid operation that# reliably and safely provided free meals in Gaza.
But its operations were shrouded in secrecy and# its sites were marred by violence.
Hundreds of## Palestinians were reportedly killed# by Israeli troops as they sought aid,## though Israel maintains it only fired# warning shots to control the crowds.
It comes as hospital officials in Gaza say# at least 24 people were killed and Israeli## strikes this past weekend.
Israel says it# was responding to gunfire on its troops.## Authorities in Gaza told the "News Hour" that# the strike targeted displaced Palestinians.
ABDULLAH AL-MAJDALAWI, Public Relations Director,# Gaza Civil Defense (through translator):## It is important to note that this# all happens during a period that## should have been a cease-fire.
But this# violation was very clear today.
Some## of those targeted were in tents.
Now# their bodies are completely charged.
GEOFF BENNETT: Meantime, in Lebanon, thousands# attended the funeral today for Hezbollah's top## military commander who was killed in an# Israeli strike this weekend in Beirut.## Israel has been stepping up its attacks# on Lebanon in recent weeks as it tries## to push the country to move faster# in disarming the militant group.
The EPA is starting to allow the use# of pesticides containing PFAS on food.## It's part of an effort to roll back the# regulation of what are called forever## chemicals because they don't break down# easily in the environment.
Last week,## the agency approved the use of two# new pesticides that qualify as PFAS.
It means that farmers could spread# them on crops like romaine, lettuce,## broccoli and potatoes.
The Washington# Post is reporting that agency plans to## approve four more pesticides.
Not much# is known about their long-term impact,## but PFAS have been linked to certain cancers,# birth defects and other health problems.
In a statement to the "News Hour"# today, the EPA said it will provide## transparent science-based information# on how the chemicals are evaluated.
On Wall Street today, stocks enjoyed# solid gains to start the Thanksgiving## holiday week.
The Dow Jones industrial# average added more than 200 points.
The## Nasdaq jumped nearly 600 points.
The S&P 500# posted one of its best days since the summer.
And a beloved star of Indian# cinema, actor Dharmendra, has died.## He rose to fame in the 1970s with hits# like "Sholay," Bollywood's take on a## spaghetti Western.
At the time, the film# was the highest grossing Bollywood movie## ever.
Dharmendra was known as part# action hero, part romantic lead.
In a career spanning over six decades,# he appeared in over 300 movies and is## widely considered one of the greatest# Indian actors of all time.
Dharmendra## had been in and out of the hospital# in recent weeks.
He was 89 years old.
And Viola Fletcher, the oldest living survivor of# the 1921 Tulsa Race Massacre, has died.
Fletcher## was just 7 years old when a white mob destroyed# the Greenwood district of Tulsa, once known as## Black Wall Street, killing hundreds, burning# businesses, schools and churches, and leaving## as many as 10,000 people homeless.
Fletcher# carried those memories for more than a century.
In her later years, she became# a national witness to history,## speaking with students and journalists# and testifying before Congress.
VIOLA FLETCHER, Tulsa Race Massacre Survivor: I# will never forget the violence of the white mob## when we left our home.
I still see Black men# seeing -- being shot.
I hear the screams.
I## have lived through the massacre every day.
Our# country may forget this history, but I cannot.
GEOFF BENNETT: Fletcher was one of two# survivors who sued the state of Oklahoma## seeking damages from the city.
Last year, the# state's Supreme Court rejected their case,## dealing a serious setback to a# decades-long fight for reparations.
Fletcher's grandson, in confirming her passing,## said: "She had a beautiful smile on her# face.
She loved life.
She loved people."
Viola Fletcher was 111 years old.
Still to come on the "News# Hour": we remember Jimmy Cliff,## the reggae singer who brought the# music genre to audiences worldwide;## Tamara Keith and Amy Walter break# down the latest political headlines;## how life is changing for trans Americans under# the Trump administration; and a documentary## explores the $3 billion industry that's been# created to protect against school shootings.
AMNA NAWAZ: A sweeping new investigation# by the Associated Press is raising serious## questions about what's happening# inside America's immigration courts.
White House correspondent Liz Landers# has more on how the administration has## circumvented the asylum process.
LIZ LANDERS: Every day, all across## the country, asylum cases are being tossed out,## and asylum seekers exit the courtroom into the# waiting arms and cuffs of immigration officers,## that according to a new report from the# Associated Press headlined "Migrants## thought they were in a court for a routine# hearing.
Instead, it was a deportation trap."
One of its authors, Josh Goodman, joins us now.
Josh, thank you for joining the "News Hour."
JOSH GOODMAN, Associated Press: Thank you.
LIZ LANDERS: In reporting th.. describe the scene as you watch migrants walk# into court and then walk out into a legal snare?
JOSH GOODMAN: Yes, we witnessed multiple# arrests over several months.
This was a## routine practice by which government attorneys# would go before a judge, dismiss a case,## which would typically be a good outcome for# someone trying to stay in the United States.
And as soon as they would leave the courtroom,# they would be arrested by ICE agents or federal## agents, frequently with masks.
Nationwide, it's# estimated that there were over 2,000 arrests## in this manner.
Some of the courts were quite# chaotic, arresting people in hallways.
People## were being trapped in elevators.
Journalists# were being rough-handled, scenes of fathers## being torn from their children, women begging# federal agents to let their husbands go.
These are people who wanted to follow the# rules.
They didn't have a criminal record.## They were making an asylum claim# and going through all the stages## that are required and were completely# blindsided by what happened to them.
LIZ LANDERS: What has changed in these immigration# courts under this new Trump administration?
JOSH GOODMAN: So these immigration courts# were kind of structurally flawed from the## very beginning.
They are not part of the# independent judiciary in the way that tax## court or federal court or any multiple# courts around the United States are.
They are part of the executive branch.
They# actually are part of the Justice Department.## They had a degree of professionalism over time# that was built up.
And these judges were allowed## to really rule like any other court.
But they were# always very vulnerable to some sort of takeover.
What we have seen now under the second# Trump administration, they are effectively## exploiting those vulnerabilities, issuing new# orders about what judges can and cannot rule## on.
And they're really narrowing the scope# that these judges have to decide the cases.
LIZ LANDERS: How do the attorneys and judges# within the immigration court system feel about## the role that they're playing under# this new Trump administration tactic?
JOSH GOODMAN: What I found is that overall these# are people who are very patriotic.
They signed up## to work in the immigration system because# they wanted to protect America's borders,## root out the true people who need# asylum from some of the people who## are claiming it for nonlegal reasons# or economic refugees, for example.
And they did not sign up for this at# all.
One of the judges I talked to said,## this is really like deciding death penalty cases# in a traffic court environment, because they have## so few tools to actually mete out justice that --# and they have such a huge docket -- that they are## rushing through these cases without giving# them the due consideration that they need.
And I noticed in some of the text# messages between the federal agents## and the attorneys a great deal of empathy# and people kind of saying to themselves,## this is cruel and we don't# really want to be a part of this.
LIZ LANDERS: I was struck by that in# your reporting, that these attorneys## who are arguing in front of these# judges are in direct contact, it seems,## with the ICE agents who are waiting outside.
JOSH GOODMAN: This process starts about two weeks# in advance.
Every attorney is assigned a number of## people, like maybe 40 cases that day.
They have# to come up with a list for the client -- the## client here is ICE -- of people who they would --# quote, unquote -- call "amenable" to detention.
And then, on the day of the hearings, the# attorney and the ICE officer in the hallway are## coordinating almost in real time so that they# can identify what the individual looks like,## what kind of shirt, black shirt, a# white shirt, whatever they're wearing,## as well as if indeed the judge dismissed# the case, because that was the hook.
If the judge didn't dismiss the case,# they couldn't arrest these individuals.## If they're trying to reach a quota every day,# it's a lot easier to pick up people at court.
LIZ LANDERS: One of the stated reasons that# the Trump administration has adopted this## new policy is to work through the# asylum system's yearslong backlog.## Is it affecting the backlog and# is it affecting other systems?
JOSH GOODMAN: That's a great question.
The# backlog is a huge challenge.
It has been## for many, many years.
It keeps growing.
The# numbers themselves are not 100 percent clear.
The government has said that they have# managed to reduce the backlog from about## 4.2 million to 3.8 million cases, which is still# mind-boggling for only 600 judges nationwide.
But## they're also benefiting from the fact that# the border itself is sealed.
In other words,## there's not a lot of new people# coming in and clogging up the system.
But every time that there are arrests in the# streets, any time there are major roundups,## those people also get sort of# thrown back into the system,## and they can actually increase the numbers.# So, it's not entirely clear, but I think,## at a very minimum, what we can say is that the# backlog is not growing as fast as it once was.
LIZ LANDERS: So you find in this reporting that# a number of these judges, these immigration court## judges have been laid off.
You guys profile in# your story a judge in Ohio who had been fired.
Why are immigration judges getting fired right now# if there is such a backlog to process these cases?
JOSH GOODMAN: Yes, I mean, this is# a great conundrum.
There's about 90## judges that have been fired since February.# And the government, Trump administration,## very clearly says that they are not targeting# anyone from a viewpoint perspective.
But the data speaks for itself.# These judges were more favorable to## migrants than the national average.
LIZ LANDERS: Josh Goodman, thank# you so much for joining us.
JOSH GOODMAN: Thank you for having me.
GEOFF BENNETT: A former key Trump ally# plans her departure from Congress,## DOGE quietly dissolves, and Washington grapples# with rising health care costs yet again.
To discuss that and more, we turn now# to our Politics Monday duo.
That is## Amy Walter of The Cook Political Report# With Amy Walter and Tamara Keith of NPR.
It's always great to see you both.
TAMARA KEITH, National Public# Radio:.. GEOFF BENNETT: S.. with spiking Obamacare premiums, but# that announcement, our White House## and congressional teams are told, was# delayed after congressional Republicans## pushed back against the president's apparent# sudden embrace of these expiring subsidies.
Amy, what does this delay tell us about the# internal dynamics of the Republican Party,## especially between the White House and# Republican congressional leadership?
AMY WALTER, The Cook Political Report: Right.
So the issue of .. with and not really found an answer# to.
I went back because I remembered,## after John Boehner, the former speaker,# was out of office for a little while,## in 2017, when the first version of# repeal and replace the ACA came up,## he was quoted at a conference saying: I have# been in Congress for 25 years.
I have never## seen one time when Congress agreed what# a health care proposal should look like.
In other words, even before the replace and# repeal failed in 2018, he was predicting it## wasn't going to work because Republicans have such# a tough time on this issue.
So that's number one.
The second is that where the divide really# is between a president, who believes that## this is a political liability coming up in the# midterms, he sees where the polls are, he sees## how much support there is for extending these# ACA subsidies, and his Republicans in Congress,## who ideologically are deeply opposed to# everything that the ACA stands for and## many of whom voted to repeal it not that long# ago when the president was in his first term.
GEOFF BENNETT: More than 60 times.
AMY WALTER: Oh, yes, the 60 times,## and then they finally got the vote to# actually repeal it in 2017 o.. GEOFF BENNETT: Right.
Right.
Yes.
TAMARA KEITH: Yes.
GEOFF BENNETT: So, Tam, I mean, how does# .. to Amy's point, between ideological purity,# no Obamacare subsidies, and pragmatism,## you have to do something# about these premiums spiking?
AMY WALTER: Right.
TAMARA KEITH: So.. Republican Party, or at least he's# changed the Republican electorate.
I was just talking to a political# scientist about this today.
He has## expanded the party.
He's expanded the# tent.
He's brought in a lot of voters## who are more working class, who would be more# sensitive to these spikes in health care costs.
And he has his finger on the pulse of# his base, which is not the same as the## traditional Republican Party, or the same# as the Tea Party, which wants to make the## government smaller.
And so, when you have a# big tent -- and President Trump's presidency## has sort of helped paper over this, when# you have a big tent, there are divisions.
And what you're seeing right now is, with# such a narrow Republican majority in the## House and the Senate, those tensions between# the Libertarian wing and the populist wing or## whatever you want to call it, those tensions make# it really hard to get something done.
And now you## have Marjorie Taylor Greene leaving, which is# one fewer vote for Republicans in the House.
GEOFF BENNETT: Well, what does it# say, Amy, that Republicans have had## a decade to come up with some sort of free# market solution for health care coverage... and yet they#haven't been able to settle on one?
AMY WALTER: Well, the one person who was# the most successful -- Republican who was## successful in passing real health care reform# was Mitt Romney as governor of Massachusetts... GEOFF BENNETT: Right.
AMY WALTER: ... .. GEOFF BENNETT: For Obamacare.
AMY WALTER: Exactly.
And because of that, I thi.. then we use that platform because it was# something that Democrats used.
But just## sort of building on Tam's point too about# the tension within the party, there are 13## Republicans that have stated publicly, we would# like to see these ACA extensions go forward.
They all sit in vulnerable districts, districts# that are up in 2026 that either Trump narrowly## carried or Kamala Harris carried.
But most of# the people in Congress don't sit in those kinds## of districts.
But these are the people who# will determine who's in the House majority.
GEOFF BENNETT: You mentioned Marjorie# Taylor Greene.
She announced on Friday## her resignation from Congress# effective January 5.
And that## announcement came just one week after she# criticized President Trump -- or, rather,## President Trump withdrew his support# for her after she criticized him.
But what does her sudden decision to resign tell## us about the fault lines within# the MAGA era Republican Party?
TAMARA KEITH: Well, first, it tells us that# being a member of Congress just isn't that great.## And you have seen a lot of members of Congress# complain about certain -- complain any number## of things, experiencing threats to their# families, and just the general unpleasantness.
There are some ways to see this as# a victory for President Trump.
She## criticized him.
She wasn't just -- it# wasn't just the Epstein files.
It was## on the economy.
It was on Venezuela.
It# was on other foreign entanglements.
She## was becoming a critic from inside the# party.
And that was a problem for him.
And rather than sticking it out and# fighting, she said, all right, peace,## I'm out.
And so, in some ways, that's a# win for President Trump.
In other ways,## it's a sign that these fissures exist and# people are already thinking about what the## party looks like when he's no longer# the leader who sort of blocks the sun## and prevents others in the party from defining# what the Republican Party really is going forward.
GEOFF BENNETT: Could her resignation# trigger a ripple effect where you have## other far right members, MAGA-aligned# folks break away from President Trump?
AMY WALTER: So I think she was# a unique figure, in that, look,## she came into Congress and instantly went for# the shiny object and being in the spotlight.
And you could make the other case that she just# got too close to that spotlight and it singed## her and now it's over.
But you can also say# that, going back to Tam's point about what the## Trump coalition looks like now,# if you look both at polling and at## election results that have happened, the# elections that have happened since 2025,## what you see is a MAGA base, the core# Trump base, they still like him a lot.
They're going to stick with him.
It's that# periphery coalition, the younger voters,## the Latino voters, the independents.
When# you see his numbers among those voters,## those were people who they weren't ever# assigning themselves the MAGA label.## They voted for Donald Trump because they# thought he was going to do certain things,## especially on the economy, and now# they don't see those things happening.
And so he's losing favor with them.
That is the# bigger threat to the Trump agenda going forward,## meaning, what will the Trump coalition look like# in 2028?
Those are the voters who determine that.
GEOFF BENNETT: Well, I mentioned the# dissolution of DOGE in the intro.
And## lucky for us we still have time to talk about it.
So, Tam, so DOGE, the Department of# Government Efficiency, is dissolving## ahead of schedule.
This organization,# agency, however you want to describe it,## they claim to have cut tens of billions of# dollars in spending.
They have provided no## verifiable accounting.
How wide# is the accountability gap here?
TAMARA KEITH: Yes, they never provided# the receipts for all of these cuts that## they claimed to make.
Many of the cuts# that they claimed to make weren't real.## Others were extremely inefficient, which# led to actually more spending, not less.
And the reality is that DOGE has# basically been dead since the summer,## since President Trump's falling out with# Elon Musk.
They have sort of repaired## that relationship now.
But DOGE was more an# idea than it ever was a practical reality.
GEOFF BENNETT: What's it say about the# feasibility of rapid-fire bureaucratic## overhaul in a federal government# that's built on bureaucracy?
AMY WALTER: Yes, I think the one thing# it was successful in doing though, Geoff,## is that it has fundamentally altered the way# that agencies work and may be working far,## far beyond just the four years of Trump's term.
GEOFF BENNETT: Well, we covered# a ton of ground on this Monday.
Amy Walter, Tamara Keith, thanks, as always.
AMY WALTER: You're welcome.
TAMARA KEITH: You're welcome.
GEOFF BENNETT: Since President Trump reentered the#White House, his administration has## moved to restrict rights for transgender# people, from transition-related medical## care for youth to sports participation# to identity markers on passports.
William Brangham has an update on these actions,## the legal challenges to# them, and what may come next.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: LGBTQ+ advocates# say that many of President Trump's## policies present a critical threat to# the roughly 1 percent of Americans,## that is some 2.8 million people,# who identify as transgender.
So for a closer look at some of these moves,# we are joined by Alejandra Caraballo.
She's a## transgender activist and civil rights attorney who# teaches at Harvard Law School's Cyberlaw Clinic.
Welcome to the "News Hour."
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO, Harvard Law# School: Thank you for having me.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: After Trump won the election,# you told The Harvard C.. four years would be really just a matter of# survival.
How has that survival been going?
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: It's# been incredibly difficult.
The Trump administration has taken a# whole-of-government approach to target## the trans community, in everything from how we're# able to identify ourselves on identity documents,## to how we obtain our health care,# to even where we go to the bathroom,## and even the ability to serve in the military.
And so for the entirety of the trans community,## it really has become a matter of survival, and# that survival has been incredibly difficult.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: When you're talking to# people in the community and people who are## supporters and allies, do they share that# same sense of dread as to what's going on?
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: Absolutely.
I think a lot of allie.. at the same time, it's difficult because there# is so much happening.
We're kind of only one## small part of everything that is happening,# between the assaults on our institutions,## the attacks on immigrants, the# open corruption in the government.
It makes it really hard to be able to focus# what is happening to the trans community,## when so much is happening all at the same time.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: Back during the# election, political analysts point## to that notorious set of ads that the# president ran against Kamala Harris,## she's for they/them, he's for you, as both# being divisive and effective as an ad campaign.
And, as you know, there are polls that show that# somewhere around half of Americans approve of what## the president is doing vis-a-vis trans people.
How# do you explain that?
How does that sit with you?
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: I think# it's incredibly troubling,## especially with the kinds of moves that has made# for the trans community to even live our lives,## to even access health care, to even access# housing, or to even work without discrimination.
But I think the Trump administration,# really, I think they're overplaying their## hand and I think a lot of the Republican# Party overlearned the lesson from 2024,## where their economic populism was able to# win over swing voters and they attributed it## to anti-trans politics, because it failed# in Virginia and it failed in New Jersey.
Winsome Earle-Sears spent over# 50 percent of her ads been,## according to NOTUS, on anti-trans ads,# and she lost by, I think almost... WILLIAM BRANGHAM: This was in the governor's race.
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: Yes, by over 15# perc.. extremely heinous anti-trans ads.
And it# just failed to materialize as any sort## of impact on electoral politics,# because, at the end of the day,## people want to hear about things that# actually affect their day-to-day lives,## and trans people, it just doesn't register# for them, for better or for worse.
When it comes to our issues in terms of like our# access to health care and all those other things,## it makes it very hard for us to get# those policies.
But at the same time,## on the negative side, it doesn't have# much saliency with the electorate.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: The Supreme Court,# as you know, is about to take up a## case next year about the participation# of transgender athletes in sports.
Again,## over half of Americans believe that transgender# athletes should not be playing in sports.
What do you think is at stake# in that particular case?
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: Yes, I# mean, there's, on its face,## what's at stake in the case, which is a# middle school girl just wanting to play## sports with her friends.
And# let's not lose sight of that.
And there had always been these commonsense# compromises, that you had to be on hormones## for your two years.
You can't just show up# and just say, I'm a girl and play on the## sports teams.
That's not how it worked.
There had# been these compromises within the sports teams,## within local school districts to# figure out how to make this work.
And this instead is saying that the# government's coming in and dictating## who can and can't play sports.
But it goes beyond# that, because Title IX, which is at stake here,## and as well as the Equal Protection Clause,# really defines what counts as discrimination## writ large in all the institutions of learning# from local kindergartens to universities.
And so that could determine potentially how# discrimination on the basis of sex impacts## trans people across the country.# We could see, depending on how this## decision comes down and how it comes out# at oral argument and how it's written,## basically an endorsement of bathroom bans by the# Supreme Court, facilities bans, a lack of any## sort of protections within discrimination law# for trans people in the context of education.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: I want to ask you one# thing.
You have faced your own share of## criticism for some of the things# you have written on social media.
Where do you see the boundaries in# terms of how to have this debate,## especially as it pertains to people# who are near and dear to you?
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: I think about this a lot in# terms of the incentives of social media and how## it can incentivize a certain style of engagement.
But I think, in general, one of the things# I have always tried to say and repeat,## the quote is, be brutal to systems,## kind to people.
And I think that's one# of the things that tries to guide me is,## we need to hold people to account and hold systems# to account, but try to be kinder to people.
And I certainly have tried to grow myself in# this respect, and I know I have not always## been perfect, but I think that's just an# unfortunate side effect of social media.
WILLIAM BRANGHAM: All right, that is# Alejandra Caraballo from Harvard Law School.
Thank you so much for being here.
ALEJANDRA CARABALLO: Thanks for having me.
AMNA NAWAZ:## A new documentary looks at how gun violence# has led to school lockdown drills becoming## a universal part of childhood in America.
That# sparked the creation and explosive growth of an## entire industry of active shooter preparedness# products now worth an estimated $3 billion.
MAN: Lockdown 1 is by far our most# popular.
It works on any door.
MAN: Sirens and strobes throughout# the organization are now initiated.
MAN: It can move.
It has handles, and you# literally could move with the table if so desired.
MAN: Right after Sandy Hook happened,# teachers and schools started calling us.
MAN: When Sandy Hook happened and we# realized that the children were at risk,## we said we have got this great technology.
MAN: And now we're in 4,000# schools across the country.
AMNA NAWAZ: The documentary called "Thoughts# & Prayers" is available to stream now on HBO## Max.
I recently spoke with the filmmaking team# behind it, Zackary Canepari and Jessica Dimmock.
Zack and Jessica, welcome to the# "News Hour."
Thanks for joining us.
JESSICA DIMMOCK, Co-Director,# "Thoughts & Prayers": Thank you.
ZACKARY CANEPARI.. AMNA NAWAZ: So I wanted to get into the# story behind.. But, Zack, kick us off here and just# tell us a little bit more about some## of those pitches we just heard, some# of the products we just heard about,## the fact that this is a whole industry# most people don't even know about## that's cropped up in recent years.
What# more should we understand about that?
ZACKARY CANEPARI: Yes, and the film documents# sort of the various different training programs## and products and cultural effects of all these# things across America due to gun violence.
And the products, the scene that you guys# just watched was from the National School## Safety Conference, which is a very# typical sort of American conference,## where they go to the hotel, they have# got the lazy river, they have got## the pool party, and then they have vendors.
And# those vendors are pitching products to schools and## other businesses looking for ways to help# prevent or stop or slow mass shootings.
Prevent is probably not the right word, because# it's more like slowing mass shootings down.## But those products are all on the marketplace# trying to find homes in schools across America.
AMNA NAWAZ: I mean, in the# world of products that you saw,## did anything surprise you that this thing exists?
JESSICA DIMMOCK: I think what# was most surprising was, like,## the calm and collected manner with which people# would kind of assume that any of this would work.
There's one thing that's a shield that kind# of opens up and theoretically could stop an## AR-15 bullet.
And, theoretically,# the demonstrator is talking about## how a kid aged 10 could run his fellow# classmates out to safety.
And, like,## when you really play that out in your# mind, you're like, wait, wait, wait.
OK.
So AR-15 bullets are flying at this shield# and this kid is supposed to be just ramming## through them?
Like, when you really stop and# think about the scenarios and what it would## actually take for any of this stuff to really be# effective, I think that's what's so surprising.
AMNA NAWAZ: Well, Jessica, I mean,# the industry is there because,## as you report in the film, 95 percent of# American schools now run lockdown drills.## There have been some 236 school shootings# in the last seven years where at least## one person was killed or injured.# That's according to Education Week.
Take us behind the film for a moment and tell us## about what made you want to make# this film in the first place.
JESSICA DIMMOCK: Yes.
So Zack and I have a child.
And like many American#parents, when she was approaching school age,## we started to think about the inevitability# of drills and started to think about what## it actually would be like to look at these.# And we went down the wormhole that I think a## lot of parents do, which is like, what's# the plan?
How is she going to stay safe?
And then once we started digging into that,# we realized that there was this whole kind of## world of safety and preparedness, which in some# ways we are looking at with some cynicism, but## ultimately the industry is not necessarily# the problem.
The industry exists because## there's a lack of meaningful gun reform# and people are trying to solve a problem.
We have some doubts that this is the# actual way to solve this problem,## but we understand in some# ways why the industry exists.
AMNA NAWAZ: I mean, I will share, I remember when# my oldest was just 4 years old and she came home## to talk about her first drill in pre-K,# when they told her, this is what happens## if an animal gets into the school, you have to# hide and be quiet and it just broke my heart.
Most parents don't get to see# the drills that these kids are## going through across the country.
Zack,# you witnessed these.
You saw a lot of## them firsthand.
Take us inside.# What is that like for the kids?
ZACKARY CANEPARI: I think it's very --# it's unique because it simultaneously## is the darkest thing that we can# imagine and also pretty mundane.
The kids are -- especially as they# get older.
They have been doing them## for years.
For the young kids, it's got# this spooky quality, but the kids don't## totally even really understand what# it is that they're practicing for.
With the older kids, they have been# doing this twice a year for their## entire school career.
And they have gotten to# the point like in high school at this point,## I think a lot of schools recommend that the# kids actually pick up something to use as## a improvised weapon.
It's really# just to stand there and hold it.
But the idea that this is even in the psyche# of these kids over years and years, I think,## is really what we're pointing at.
These# individual drills, they don't always## look like much.
They're pretty short.
But I# think the collective experience over many,## many years, and even just, again, just# talking about it and thinking about it,## hearing about other shootings, I# think that's what's the most damaging.
But, yes, the drills are just now# part of our ritual, American ritual.
AMNA NAWAZ: I mean, some of the most powerful## moments in the documentary are when# we hear from these kids dire.. I want to play for folks just# one of the interviews you did## with a student named Julie.
Take a listen.
JULIE, Middle School Student:# I really want to be a teacher,## elementary schoolteacher.
I really like# little kids, and I like working with them.## I like letting them express themselves and# teaching them to help them succeed in life.
But, again, that will be frustrating because# of school shootings.
I have to do a bunch of## trainings for them, get ready.
And especially# if I'm a teacher and one of the kids get hurt,## I will be very guilty, even if it's# not my fault.
It would just be like,## I could have done this to protect them.# And I would really -- I would feel guilty.
AMNA NAWAZ: Jessica, tell us about what else you# heard from the other kids when they would talk## about these drills and also just the possibility# of something happening in their schools.
JESSICA DIMMOCK: Yes, well, a couple of# things that the kids are so clear on,## which was really eye-opening for us as# people that didn't grow up doing this,## one, they're worried about it all the time.# They're in rooms and they're always kind of## thinking about where the exit is.# Could I jump out of that window?
Is## this building high enough for me to survive# something like that?
Can I run out the door?
So that kind of constant mental noise is# something that they -- is pretty universal.## They talk about it a lot.
They also talk# about close calls.
While shootings at schools## themselves are rather rare, they absolutely# -- as all Americans know, they do happen.
And the amount of kind of close# calls that these kids are around,## someone had a kill list, someone made a threat# on social media, a janitor at school had a plan,## this kind of proximity to the# violence was also really striking.
And I'd say the third thing that# really blew us away is that the## kids are clear about why this goes on.# They're very clear about that this is## a problem about guns and that this# is a uniquely American phenomenon.
AMNA NAWAZ: Zack, what about the impact# on teachers?
What did you hear from them?
ZACKARY CANEPARI: Well, I think, for the# teachers, teachers are on the front lines## of so many American culture wars.
It was masks# and book bands and obviously this as well.
And so what I found so striking was the teacher# in our film saying that there's been a huge## drop-off with teachers.
And the ones that are# in this program, the program in the film is in## Utah where they train teachers beyond just active# shooter preparedness.
They train them to use guns.
And the ones that are in this program for her# were the ones that were left, being that this## is what we're willing to do to protect our# kids and continue to educate kids.
I mean,## what a crazy -- that all they're trying to# do is educate, be teachers and there just not## totally -- there's no way that they're prepared# for -- this kind of ask is just above and beyond.
AMNA NAWAZ: Jessica, in all the conversations# with students and teachers and others,## is there consensus on what# they want to see changed,## on what they want public officials or leaders# to do or to act to stop this from happening?
Or## is there a resignation that this is# just part of their normal life now?
JESSICA DIMMOCK: I mean, I think that there# is a resignation that has deeply set in,## which is partially it has to do with why we# made this film and the way that we approach it.
I think, when we think about drills, what's# important for everyone to understand,## including your listeners, is that all of the# things that we show in our film, which are very## commonplace in America, are all predicated on the# idea that this violence cannot be stopped or that## this violence is just coming and what we need to# do, instead of prevent it, is to practice for it.
And so I think what we really want# is to for people to feel enraged## that -- and hopeful that we don't# need to live this and that there## is a different way to live that's# free from this kind of violence.
AMNA NAWAZ: The film is called "Thoughts# & Prayers."
It's streaming now on HBO Max.
Filmmakers Zackary Canepari and Jessica Dimmock,## thank you so much for making the# time to speak with us about it.
JESSICA DIMMOCK: Thank you.
ZACKARY CANEPARI: Of course.
Thank you.
GEOFF BENNETT: Finally tonight: Reggae legend#Jimmy Cliff has died.
His family## says the cause was complications# following a seizure and pneumonia.
A native son of Jamaica, a two-time Grammy winner# and a member of the Rock and Roll Hall of Fame,## Cliff carried his country's music from# the streets of Kingston to audiences## around the world, turning# reggae into a global sound.
He was considered the first international star# of reggae and, for a time, Jimmy Cliff was the## genre's greatest ambassador.
He personified# the music of Jamaica, building a career## that spanned nearly seven decades and a# fan base that reached across the world.
Cliff rose to prominence in the early 1960s,# paving the way for another giant of the genre,## Bob Marley, just as Jamaica was gaining# its independents from Britain.
He said his## music and the early sounds of reggae itself# were changing right along with his country.
JIMMY CLIFF, Musician: Music# doesn't really stay the same.## I mean.
Especially popular music# keeps changing.
So reggae music,## we know that is coming from, like you say,# what was called ska, then to rocksteady,## which was the bridge to reggae.
And then, when it# became known as reggae, that name kind of stuck.
GEOFF BENNETT: He sang in a lilting tenor voice# and performed with a charismatic upbeat persona,## outward joy on stage that so often belied the# seriousness and social consciousness of his music.
JIMMY CLIFF: The people# don't want another Vietnam!
GEOFF BENNETT: Cliff's songs# delved into politics and activism,## like his anti-war anthem "Vietnam."
He# said music could give people purpose.
JIMMY CLIFF: Music can highlight# awareness.
And from that awareness,## people can take some kind of# action to better the situation.
I think that's the role music has# played through the ages.
And I think## it's the role that it is playing now.
And# I think that is the role that it can play.
You want to go and beg work for $10 a week# for the rest of my life?
I would rather die.
GEOFF BENNETT: A gifted actor, as well as# musician, Cliff starred in the 1972 crime## drama "The Harder They Come," a groundbreaking# Jamaican film.
He won acclaim for his lead role## as Ivan Martin, an aspiring reggae musician# turned criminal.
He also wrote much of the## film's soundtrack, which helped to bring reggae# to a wider audience, especially in the U.S.
After a period when his star had noticeably# dimmed, he reemerged, perhaps most memorably## with his unmistakable modern take on Johnny# Nash's "I Can See Clearly Now," recorded for## the soundtrack of "Cool Runnings," the 1993 hit# film about the Jamaican Olympic bobsled team.
Nominated for seven Grammys, he# won twice for best reggae album.## In 2003, Cliff received Jamaica's Order# of Merit, the country's highest honor## for those in the arts and sciences.
And, in# 2010, he was inducted into the Rock and Hall## of Fame.
One of reggae music's greatest# pioneers, Jimmy Cliff, was 81 years old.
AMNA NAWAZ: A true trailblazer.
He will be missed.
Well, join us back here tomorrow night for# the latest in our series Rethinking College## and how artificial intelligence# is disrupting higher education.
And that is the "News Hour"# for tonight.
I'm Amna Nawaz.
GEOFF BENNETT: And I'm Geoff Bennett.
For all of us here at the "PBS News..
Documentary explores industry built around school security
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 10m 12s | Documentary ‘Thoughts and Prayers’ explores industry built around school security (10m 12s)
How life is changing for trans Americans under Trump
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 6m 35s | How life is changing for trans Americans under the Trump administration (6m 35s)
ICE agents arresting migrants at mandatory court check-ins
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 6m 50s | 'Deportation trap': Immigration agents arresting migrants at mandatory court check-ins (6m 50s)
Judge tosses James Comey, Letitia James cases
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 5m 51s | Judge tosses James Comey, Letitia James cases, rules prosecutor was illegally appointed (5m 51s)
News Wrap: Pentagon investigating Kelly over video
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 6m | News Wrap: Pentagon investigating Kelly over video urging troops to refuse illegal orders (6m)
Remembering the life of reggae icon Jimmy Cliff
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 3m 27s | Remembering the life and influential career of reggae icon Jimmy Cliff (3m 27s)
Tamara Keith and Amy Walter on GOP struggle with health care
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 8m 28s | Tamara Keith and Amy Walter on GOP's struggle with rising health care costs (8m 28s)
Ukraine and U.S. revise peace plan as origins questioned
Video has Closed Captions
Clip: 11/24/2025 | 4m 33s | Ukraine and U.S. revise peace plan as origins questioned (4m 33s)
Providing Support for PBS.org
Learn Moreabout PBS online sponsorship
- News and Public Affairs

FRONTLINE is investigative journalism that questions, explains and changes our world.

- News and Public Affairs

Amanpour and Company features conversations with leaders and decision makers.












Support for PBS provided by:
Major corporate funding for the PBS News Hour is provided by BDO, BNSF, Consumer Cellular, American Cruise Lines, and Raymond James. Funding for the PBS NewsHour Weekend is provided by...







